Tuesday, January 16, 2024

Time to Re-Evaluate the Legacy of Martin Luther King

Time to Re-Evaluate the Legacy of Martin Luther King 

While long hailed civil-rights ' leader ' Martin ĹUTHER King Jr may have had good intentions and was superior in his non-violent approach to protest and change than many who followed him such as Jesse Jackson,  Al Sharpton , Black Panther and BLM propententsį, his affirmative action  programs for blacks, from bussing to food stamps and other government-heavy hand out programs have been failures. Blacks were better off in 1965, as author Vince E Ellison points put , before King and LBJ landmark 'civil rights handout' legislation took full effect , than they are today 60 years later- no doubt one key reason blacks are finally waking up and jumping the Democratic party in larger numbers than ever before.

Originally published at American Thinker

'After finding evidence that the “man of God” and “moral conscience of our nation,” the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., participated in the rape of a parishioner, engaged in numerous sex orgies, received cash payments from known communists, and admitted that he was a Marxist, King biographer and Pulitzer Prize-winning author David Garrow wrote of King, “There is no question that a profoundly painful reckoning and reconsideration inescapably awaits.”

Black Democrats and White liberals rail about the gains derived from the Civil Rights Movement.  I ask, “What gains?”  If murder, poverty, and mass incarceration are gains, you may have a point.  In an attempt to make him untouchable, liberals have protected King’s counterfeit legacy by sealing his FBI files until 2027.  Nevertheless, his reckoning is here.

But that reckoning shouldn’t occur exclusively because of King’s immoral behavior.   It shouldn’t happen because the “Good Reverend’s” best friend, Ralph Abernathy, in his book And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, described King beating a woman and sleeping with two others at the Lorrain Motel the night before his death.  Or because Arthur Schlesinger recorded Jackie Kennedy saying he was “terrible, phony, and tricky.”  Or that Black Major League Baseball player Don Newcombe reported to the FBI that King was a “drunk” and had an illegitimate child by a woman married to a sterile Los Angeles dentist.  Or because King allowed the dirty world of politics to turn the Black church into a puppet of the atheist and racist Democrat party.

No.  This reckoning should happen because Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement have failed Black people.  They managed only to elect many Black Americans into office, with most of them belonging to the same evil Democrat party that had necessitated the Civil Rights Movement by enslaving, raping, castrating, and oppressing Black Americans for over one hundred and fifty years.

After fifty years of following King’s failed ideology, consider these results.  On June 4, 2020, the Washington Post reported “no decrease in Black and White citizens’ wealth gap since 1968.”  The Brookings Institution reported that in 1965, only 24% of Black children were born out of wedlock.  In 2020, it was 69.4 (approximately a 300% increase).  Between 2019 and 2020, Blacks made up 11% of the population but 50% of all murders.  In May 2019, Penn State and UCLA reported that school segregation is getting worse.

This is King’s legacy.  Why are we celebrating it? 

We should be careful not to place all blame at King's feet , since he was murdered way back in 1968, yet it was many of his own redress programs that have been built on and implemented to this day with limited or even negative  results , yet they continue to be promoted by both black and white 'leadership' that came out of the MLK thinking.'


Latest example of this 60 year civil-rights failure has been the new FAA edict where airlines like United are now openly admitting new 'affirmative' plan to hire pilots and airlines workers not on merit but based on skin color, gender and equity. Meanwhile, such programs have created a whole new form of 'reverse racism' resulting in fewer jobs for QUALIFIED white men- this more than 150 years after the end of  slavery.  Even MLK, himself, would have probably scoffed at extremes that have resulted from his early civil-rights 'dream' he had in 1962.